Wriggling Thoughts: Searchable Ormulum

This is going to be a very short post, but I thought I’d go ahead and begin pondering the usefulness of transcribing Holt into a searchable online document.

Similar to the accessibility and the search-ability of my translations, we would finally have a digital edition of the Ormulum that we could use for text mining and other fun data analysis. Right now, you can find the 1878 edition freely available online (just Google it), but it’s either in a PDF or in the unhelpful digital format from the Internet Archive. The Archive of Early Middle English has the images for their digital edition of MS Junius 1 (yes!!), but it will take some time before they have edited and coded it. In the meantime, might it be useful to have even the flawed Holt and White version online somewhere?

Feel free to post your thoughts.

About carlamthomas

I received my PhD in 2016, and I'm finishing up a Postdoctoral Teaching Fellowship at New York University this year. Next year, barring some last second postdoc or job coming through, I will be living in Tennessee with my husband, dog, and cat to save money while I go on the academic job market yet again. My concentration is Early Middle English literature, language, and manuscript culture although this stretches from Old English influences to later Middle English iterations of developments in my period. I'm also an intersectional feminist, trying to inject such theory into some of my newer work, and I dabble in the monstrous (pre-modern and modern) on occasion.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Wriggling Thoughts: Searchable Ormulum

    • carlamthomas says:

      Yes, absolutely. You’re correct, but I tend to forget it exists there because I’m equally unsatisfied with their format. It could certainly function in the way that my short post suggests, except that when searching for words with accents (though strangely the /ȝ/ isn’t a problem). The accents appear as a superscript em-dash, like this: “U¯¯t.” So, unless you know that it’s going to appear like that, when you search for “ut,” the word you’re looking for doesn’t show up. I don’t particularly believe the accents are necessary for reading, so I wouldn’t include them. In a sense, we need something we can scrub for something like GitHub easily, and this isn’t it. Also, it simply replicates the page format of the printed text, which I dislike as well. I guess I’m just being picky…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s